|
Energy
The recent
"massive" energy bill is based upon tax breaks for large corporations.
They get
tax breaks for developing new approaches to our energy supply. Corporate
wealth is the driving force. A Democratic strategic initiative is urgently
needed to drastically improved national energy policy.
Check out "Peak Oil" on a web
search. Enter this phrase in quotes on Google or Yahoo to see what this is
all about. And the Administration is touting Social Security as an
impending crisis??
Here is a chart of past and
expected oil production for nine regions of the globe. Each color
represents oil production (million barrels per day). Total worldwide production
is expected to reach a maximum very soon, 2008 or 2009. Notice that oil production in the lower 48 States
(represented by green) reached a
peak back in 1971. Now, production is less than half the amount at peak, hardly
the result of resistance by environmentalists!

After 2009 prices will skyrocket (as if they haven't already) until demand is cut to
balance production. That process is similar to 1980 but with a major difference. In 1980 oil
production was limited by newly formed OPEC. What we are facing now is not
OPEC, but production limited by worldwide availability. Sufficient oil is just not
there to meet rapidly increasing demand, especially in China and India. That's why
energy prices will skyrocket until a very high cost of oil causes a collapse in demand. That's recession, big time,
and there will be no relief until new alternate energy sources become available in
large quantities. Democrats must act now!
The powers that be within Democratic circles need to develop and put forward a
massive program leading to Foreign Oil Independence Legislation,
perhaps called FOIL. Whatever it's called, a Manhattan type energy project
is urgently needed. Republicans are already pre-empting this issue, but
their proposals rely on Corporate tax breaks.
Let's get a
far-reaching, real energy program on the table now!
Foreign Oil Dependency:
- Can energy policies have
far-reaching consequences? Yes!
Absolutely! Gasoline prices are
only a small part of our energy crisis. Global warming, declining education, a deteriorating environment, and
rapidly declining social services are tied closely to our energy policies!
- Vast amounts of money are
being transferred out of the U.S. into Oil States (Middle East, Nigeria,
Venezuela, Indonesia and others). Of
the $120 current price, there is an excess of over $70/barrel that could be
eliminated by aggressive new policies to greatly reduce demand for oil.
That translates to over $400 Billion per year tax equivalent, or about a $4000 per year
tax equivalent on a family of four.
- Our oil purchases
are funding several autocratic regimes hostile to the U.S! Much of that money is used to buy weapons from the U.S., and some is
used to fund extremists groups.
- We are jeopardizing our own
economic stability by incurring a huge trade deficit with China, where their
dollar surplus is used to compete with us to secure oil. We are the ones paying for
their
energy.
- The U.S. is spending
hundreds of billions for our military to protect the oil resources and its
transportation. It will cost
much less when reliance on oil is not so critical.
- An energy program that emphasizes alternate sources, such as solar, wind, ocean waves, and others, will create a large source
of employment in the U.S. with a variety of skill levels and good wages.
- We need a strong government program
to support greatly improved energy efficiency in transportation, lighting,
and heating.
- The world's production of oil is very near its maximum. Some
optimists argue that it will not happen for another twenty years. Even
if that view were correct, demand for oil is expected to increase rapidly.
The result will be that 1) prices will skyrocket, or 2) economic stagnation will occur along with
social unrest, or 3) military actions will increase, or 4) all of these scenarios will occur simultaneously.
- Our only rational choice to deal with this crisis is to adopt an
aggressive, sustainable energy program in the United States. We will
have to confront special interests to avoid the consequences of inadequate,
symbolic, or Republican-type solutions primarily favoring the rich. We
all need to share in this enterprise.
If you would like to send your ideas concerning Energy,
please go to Issues
|